You are correct that the GPL is more restrictive than the MIT license. You cannot include GPL code in a MIT licensed product. If you distribute a combined work that combines GPL and MIT code (except in some particular situations, e.g. 'mere aggregation'), that distribution must be compliant with the GPL.
"GPLDL is a revolution - I just need the GPL licensed code and do not want to pay for expensive support licenses." Marc Anderson Entrepreneuer. Welcome to GPLDL! … GNU Lesser General Public License - Wikipedia The GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) is a free-software license published by the Free Software Foundation (FSF). Legal | Licensing - Qt With the commercial license you also have access to the official Qt Support and close strategic relationship with The Qt Company to make sure your development goals are met. Qt for Application Development is also available under GPL and LGPLv3 open source licenses. Qt tools and some libraries are only available under GPL. R Licenses
licensing - AGPL - what you can do and what you can't
File doc/COPYING is the same as GPL-2. Some files are licensed under ‘GPL (version 2 or later)’, which includes GPL-3 . See the comments in the files to see if this applies.
1. GPL requires that you provide the code for all changes made to the software. 2. GPL is the basis of open source software for programmers. 3. LGPL is used for software libraries, versus the execution files of GPL. 4. GPL offers a wide range of potential improvements for the entire programming community. 5.
Creative Commons License vs GPL - Difference and Creative Commons License vs GPL comparison. Creative Commons licenses are several copyright licenses released on December 16, 2002 by Creative Commons, a U.S. non-profit corporation founded in 2001. The GNU General Public License (GNU GPL or simply GPL) is a widely used free software license… licensing - MIT vs GPL license - Stack Overflow You are correct that the GPL is more restrictive than the MIT license. You cannot include GPL code in a MIT licensed product. If you distribute a combined work that combines GPL and MIT code (except in some particular situations, e.g. 'mere aggregation'), that distribution must be compliant with the GPL.